SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta‐analyses of test performance: 1987 to 2009
16 references·2 citing·41 second hop
Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta‐analyses of test performance: 1987 to 2009 (2013)Survey of the methods and reporting pract…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Bivariate analysis of sensiti…The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)The STARD statement for repor…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Conducting systematic reviews…Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (2002)Advanced methods in meta‐anal…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluat…Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluat…A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations (2001)A hierarchical regression app…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Empirical Evidence of Design-…Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations (1993)Combining independent studies…Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference (2017)Univariate and bivariate like…Modernizing Evidence Synthesis for Evidence-Based Medicine (2014)Modernizing Evidence Synthesi…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis (2011)Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist (2014)Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008)Fundamental Movement Skills in Children and Adolescents (2010)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)Analysing and Presenting Results (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Association of Torture and Other Potentially Traumatic Events With Mental Health Outcomes Among Populations Exposed to Mass Conflict and Displacement (2009)Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. (2014)The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013 (2014)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Simulation Run Length Control in the Presence of an Initial Transient (1983)Item Response Theory (1985)Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data (2006)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)Screening for Depression in the General Population with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D): A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis (2016)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
  • 1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests1,860 cited
  • 2002Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression1,582 cited
  • 2001A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations1,509 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited
  • 1993Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations1,404 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests1,345 cited
  • 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration1,214 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2002Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

960 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests851 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2014Modernizing Evidence Synthesis for Evidence-Based Medicine8 cited
    • 2017Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference7 cited