Tools of the Trade: UK Research Intermediaries and the Politics of ImpactsMatthew Kearnes, Matthias Wienroth2011-06-01articleMinerva76 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Research, Science, and Academiascientometrics and bibliometrics researchInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 76 citations exist upstream.References1989Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-391986The Social Life of Things1983Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists1999The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification1998The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification2006On Justification1999Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line1991The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakersCited by2016We Need to Talk about Impact: Why Social Policy Academics need to Engage with the UK's Research Impact Agenda2018An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity2015Epistemological, Artefactual and Interactional–Institutional Foundations of Social Impact of Academic Research2013'Don't make nanotechnology sexy, ensure its benefits, and be neutral': Studying the logics of new intermediary institutions in ambiguous governance contexts2022Knowledge Brokering Repertoires: Academic Practices at Science-Policy Interfaces as an Epistemological Bricolage2022Tension in Interpretations of the Social Impact of the Social Sciences: Walking a Tightrope Between Divergent Conceptualizations of Research Utilization