Article1990

THE INAPPROPRIATENESS OF USING PARTICIPANTS' REACTIONS TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAINING

3 citations0/0 files storedPsychological Reports

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation Evaluation of Teaching Practices Evaluation and Performance Assessment

Abstract

The prevailing wisdom in the evaluation of training effectiveness is that participants' reactions are of limited utility; however, they continue to be the preferred instrument in most industrial settings. The end result of this policy could be disastrous as well as expensive in light of research which indicates that training participants tend systematically to distort their evaluations of training in a positive fashion.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

References

1975Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs 1980Training in Work Organizations 1984Getting what you want by revising what you had.1984Getting what you want by revising what you had.1988Human Resource Training And Development 1984Personnel Training 1978Evaluating In-House Training Programs.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.