SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleBelief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics

Gordon Pennycook2013

OA

Articlebronze2013

Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics

Gordon Pennycook · James Allan Cheyne · Derek J. Koehler · Jonathan Albert Fugelsang

123 citations·0/0 files stored·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology Study and Philosophy of Religion Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 123 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making 2007Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition 2000Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?1999Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart 2009In two minds: Dual processes and beyond 1999The Problem of Units and the Circumstance for POMP 1998Individual differences in rational thought.2008On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.

Cited by

2019The Negative Intelligence–Religiosity Relation: New and Confirming Evidence 2014Reflective minds and open hearts: Cognitive style and personality predict religiosity and spiritual thinking in a community sample 2016Primed analytic thought and religiosity: The importance of individual characteristics.2014Evidence that analytic cognitive style influences religious belief: Comment on Razmyar and Reeve (2013)2021Do cognitive styles affect vaccine hesitancy? A dual-process cognitive framework for vaccine hesitancy and the role of risk perceptions

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2012Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal beliefarticle · 12 shared references 2022A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyondchapter · 12 shared references 2013Sleep Paralysis Postepisode Distressarticle · 12 shared references 2022A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyondpreprint · 12 shared references 2022Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinkingreview · 11 shared references 2015What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagementarticle · 9 shared references

Details

Year2013

Typearticle

Published2013-02-08

VenuePsychonomic Bulletin & Review

ISSN-L1069-9384

Languageen

Citations123

Files0 public / 0

ShelfReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Identifiers

doi10.3758/s13423-013-0394-3

openalex_workW2035549323

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2017The Negative Relationship between Reasoning and Religiosity Is Underpinned by a Bias for Intuitive Responses Specifically When Intuition and Logic Are in Conflict

2017Religious People Endorse Different Standards of Evidence When Evaluating Religious Versus Scientific Claims

2022A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyond