Operationism, Metaphysics, and the Philosophy of Ordinary Language

Abstract

It is argued that: (a) operationism shares with metaphysics four important features; (b) operationism reflects an underlying attitude toward language which may have undesirable consequences on the novice investigator; (c) the distinction between the context of discovery and the context of justification does not represent a sharp dichotomy, either logically or psychologically, and therefore cannot be used to secure operationism against criticism; (d) the triviality of many psychological findings stems in part from an oversimplified view of the role of language in psychology; (e) there is considerable knowledge concerning behavioral constancies embedded in the vernacular. Finally, a brief overview of the philosophy of ordinary language is presented and its relevance for psychology is discussed.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.