SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to write a critical letter and respond to one
6 references·2 citing·21 second hop
How to write a critical letter and respond to one (2001)How to write a critical letter and respon…How to write a peer review (2001)How to write a peer reviewWriting a case report: an editor's eye view (2000)Writing a case report: an edi…Fraud: retracted articles are still being cited (2000)Fraud: retracted articles are…Letters: A Forum for Scientific Discourse (1999)Letters: A Forum for Scientif…Revising the research record (1995)Revising the research recordLetters to the Editor 1991 (1992)Letters to the Editor 1991Helpful Hints: Writing Effective Letters to the Editor (2006)Helpful Hints: Writing Effect…Risks and benefits of the single versus the triple MMR vaccine: how can health professionals reassure parents? (2005)Risks and benefits of the sin…The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)The persistence of fraud in the literature: The Darsee case (1992)Phenomena of Retraction (1998)Comparative citation analysis of duplicate or highly related publications (2006)Post Retraction Citations in Context (2016)On the shoulders of fallen giants: What do references to retracted research tell us about citation behaviors? (2024)Unvarnished viewpoints and scientific scrutiny. Letter to the editor provide a forum for readers and help make a journal accountable to the medical community. (1997)Correcting the Literature Following Fraudulent Publication (1990)Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1993)Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud (1995)Impact of a local newspaper campaign on the uptake of the measles mumps and rubella vaccine: Table 1 (2000)Parents' perspectives on the MMR immunisation: a focus group study. (2001)A Population-Based Study of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccination and Autism (2002)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal. (2005)Problems Identified by Secondary Review of Accepted Manuscripts (1990)How to write a letter to the editor: an author's guide (2006)Writing a letter to the editor (2013)How to write an editorial letter? (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Fraud: retracted articles are still being cited28 cited
  • 1999Letters: A Forum for Scientific Discourse26 cited
  • 1992Letters to the Editor 199116 cited
  • 2000Writing a case report: an editor's eye view13 cited
  • 2001How to write a peer review12 cited
  • 1995Revising the research record12 cited

Cited by

  • 2005Risks and benefits of the single versus the triple MMR vaccine: how can health professionals reassure parents?15 cited
  • 2006Helpful Hints: Writing Effective Letters to the Editor10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work