SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
No Study Left Behind: A Network Meta-Analysis in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Demonstrating the Importance of Considering All Relevant Data
9 references·3 citing·46 second hop
No Study Left Behind: A Network Meta-Analysis in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Demonstrating the Importance of Considering All Relevant Data (2009)No Study Left Behind: A Network Meta-Anal…Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data (2007)Meta‐analysis of continuous o…Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions (2007)Adjusted indirect comparison …Indirect comparisons: the mesh and mess of clinical trials (2006)Indirect comparisons: the mes…Bayesian Methods for Evidence Synthesis in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (2006)Bayesian Methods for Evidence…Indirect comparisons of competing interventions (2005)Indirect comparisons of compe…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses (2003)Validity of indirect comparis…Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1999)Users' Guides to the Medical …Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Searching for Indirect Evidence and Extending the Network of Studies for Network Meta-Analysis: Case Study in Venous Thromboembolic Events Prevention Following Elective Total Knee Replacement Surgery (2014)Searching for Indirect Eviden…Unsolved issues of mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis: network size and inconsistency (2012)Unsolved issues of mixed trea…A Primer on Network Meta-Analysis for Dental Research (2012)A Primer on Network Meta-Anal…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Using Value of Information Analysis to Prioritise Health Research (2006)Economic Evaluation for Devices and Drugs—Same or Different? (2008)Optimal Cost-Effectiveness Decisions: The Role of the Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve (CEAC), the Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Frontier (CEAF), and the Expected Value of Perfection Information (EVPI) (2008)The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses: a step forward into complexity (2011)Bias in identification of the best treatment in a Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: a simulation study (2014)The Role of Emotion Regulation in Eating Disorders: A Network Meta-Analysis Approach (2022)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality (2010)Relative efficacy of drugs: an emerging issue between regulatory agencies and third-party payers (2010)Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study (2011)Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (2002)Multivariate Meta-Analysis: The Effect of Ignoring Within-Study Correlation (2009)Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature (2012)Random effects meta‐analysis: Coverage performance of 95 % confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation (2016)How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4 (2013)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Perspective: Network Meta-analysis Reaches Nutrition Research: Current Status, Scientific Concepts, and Future Directions (2019)Methods for Indirect Treatment Comparison: Results from a Systematic Literature Review (2024)Risk of Bias in Network Meta-Analysis (RoB NMA) tool (2025)How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. (1992)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1999)Network Meta-Analysis (2020)Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2006)Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 2003Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses944 cited
  • 2005Indirect comparisons of competing interventions680 cited
  • 2006Bayesian Methods for Evidence Synthesis in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis420 cited
  • 2007Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data280 cited
  • 2007Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions195 cited
  • 1999Users' Guides to the Medical Literature177 cited
  • 2006Indirect comparisons: the mesh and mess of clinical trials94 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Unsolved issues of mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis: network size and inconsistency38 cited
  • 2012A Primer on Network Meta-Analysis for Dental Research25 cited
  • 2014Searching for Indirect Evidence and Extending the Network of Studies for Network Meta-Analysis: Case Study in Venous Thromboembolic Events Prevention Following Elective Total Knee Replacement Surgery12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work