SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A new approach to the estimation of analytical precision
1 references·16 citing·24 second hop
A new approach to the estimation of analytical precision (1978)A new approach to the estimation of analy…Duplicate analysis in geochemical practice. Part I. Theoretical approach and estimation of analytical reproducibility (1976)Duplicate analysis in geochem…Modern Analytical Facilities 2. A Review of Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Procedures for Lithogeochemical Data (2014)Modern Analytical Facilities …Precision in chemical analysis: a critical survey of uses and abuses (2012)Precision in chemical analysi…Understanding the Quality of Chemical Data from the Urban Environment – Part 2: Measurement Uncertainty in the Decision‐Making Process (2011)Understanding the Quality of …Uncertainty functions, a compact way of summarising or specifying the behaviour of analytical systems (2011)Uncertainty functions, a comp…Use of measurement uncertainty in a probabilistic scheme to assess compliance of bottled water with drinking water standards (2010)Use of measurement uncertaint…Thompson–Howarth error analysis: unbiased alternatives to the large-sample method for assessing non-normally distributed measurement error in geochemical samples (2008)Thompson–Howarth error analys…Quality Control of Assay Data: A Review of Procedures for Measuring and Monitoring Precision and Accuracy (2008)Quality Control of Assay Data…Average Relative Error in Geochemical Determinations: Clarification, Calculation, and a Plea for Consistency (2007)Average Relative Error in Geo…On the special application of Thompson–Howarth error analysis to geochemical variables exhibiting a nugget effect (2006)On the special application of…Assessing element variability in small soil samples taken during forensic investigation (2004)Assessing element variability…THPLOT.M: A MATLAB function to implement generalized Thompson–Howarth error analysis using replicate data (2003)THPLOT.M: A MATLAB function t…ESTIMATES AND REALITY (2002)ESTIMATES AND REALITYData quality in applied geochemistry: the requirements, and how to achieve them (1992)Data quality in applied geoch…Die Validität von Umweltdaten (1991)Die Validität von UmweltdatenMonitoring accuracy and precision ? Improvements by introducing robust and resistant statistics (1986)Monitoring accuracy and preci…Dupan 3, a subroutine for the interpretation of duplicated data in geochemical analysis (1978)Dupan 3, a subroutine for the…Certified reference materials (1980)Quality assurance of chemical measurements (1989)Tracing the provenance of unfired ancient Egyptian clay figurines from Saqqara through non-destructive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (2018)Geochemical and petrographic assessment of clay outcrops and archaeological ceramics from the pre-hispanic site of Aguas Buenas (cal 400–1250 CE), Central Nicaragua (2020)The rapid estimation and control of precision by duplicate determinations (1973)Regression methods in the comparison of accuracy (1982)Forensic Discrimination of Bottle Glass by Refractive Index Measurement and Analysis of Trace Elements with ICP-MS (2000)On reiterative justice. (2004)A critique of the present use of some geochemical techniques in geoforensic analysis (2008)Harmonized guidelines for internal quality control in analytical chemistry laboratories (Technical Report) (1995)Recent trends in inter-laboratory precision at ppb and sub-ppb concentrations in relation to fitness for purpose criteria in proficiency testing (2000)Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC Technical Report) (2002)Derivation of uncertainty functions from validation studies in biological fluids: Application to the analysis of caffeine and its major metabolites in human plasma samples (2014)From method validation to result assessment: Established facts and pending questions (2018)1994 COMPILATION OF WORKING VALUES AND SAMPLE DESCRIPTION FOR 383 GEOSTANDARDS (1994)Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities1Adapted from the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) document “Nomenclature in Evaluation of Analytical Methods including Detection and Quantification Capabilities”, which originally appeared in Pure and Applied Chemistry, 67 1699–1723 (1995) © 1995 IUPAC. Republication permission granted by IUPAC.1 (1999)The International Harmonized Protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories (IUPAC Technical Report) (2006)Methodology in internal quality control of chemical analysis (2013)Towards an uncertainty paradigm of detection capability (2013)Evaluation of uncertainty in the energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence determination of platinum in alumina (2015)Objective evaluation of precision requirements for geochemical analysis using robust analysis of variance (1992)An objective assessment of analytical method precision: comparison of ICP-AES and XRF for the analysis of silicate rocks (1995)Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and comparison with analytical sources (1998)Is Non-destructive Provenancing of Pottery Possible With Just a Few Discriminative Trace Elements? (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1976Duplicate analysis in geochemical practice. Part I. Theoretical approach and estimation of analytical reproducibility240 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Average Relative Error in Geochemical Determinations: Clarification, Calculation, and a Plea for Consistency71 cited
  • 2008Quality Control of Assay Data: A Review of Procedures for Measuring and Monitoring Precision and Accuracy68 cited
  • 2011Uncertainty functions, a compact way of summarising or specifying the behaviour of analytical systems43 cited
  • 2012Precision in chemical analysis: a critical survey of uses and abuses39 cited
  • 2014Modern Analytical Facilities 2. A Review of Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Procedures for Lithogeochemical Data37 cited
  • 1986Monitoring accuracy and precision ? Improvements by introducing robust and resistant statistics37 cited
  • 2006On the special application of Thompson–Howarth error analysis to geochemical variables exhibiting a nugget effect34 cited
  • 1991Die Validität von Umweltdaten30 cited
  • 2004Assessing element variability in small soil samples taken during forensic investigation26 cited
  • 2003THPLOT.M: A MATLAB function to implement generalized Thompson–Howarth error analysis using replicate data22 cited
  • 2011Understanding the Quality of Chemical Data from the Urban Environment – Part 2: Measurement Uncertainty in the Decision‐Making Process18 cited
  • 1992Data quality in applied geochemistry: the requirements, and how to achieve them

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

16 cited
  • 1978Dupan 3, a subroutine for the interpretation of duplicated data in geochemical analysis16 cited
  • 2010Use of measurement uncertainty in a probabilistic scheme to assess compliance of bottled water with drinking water standards12 cited
  • 2008Thompson–Howarth error analysis: unbiased alternatives to the large-sample method for assessing non-normally distributed measurement error in geochemical samples12 cited
  • 2002ESTIMATES AND REALITY0 cited