Beyond Retroduction? -- Hermeneutics, Reflexivity and Social Work Practice

Abstract

Over the last three decades qualitative research methodologies have been in the ascent within social science. Yet social work evaluation studies have tended to be quantitative in nature, conventially relying upon the generation of criteria against which interventions are retrospectively judged. The generation of such criteria inevitably depends upon pre-suppositions, which in themselves go unresearched. As a consequence the .sense making activities on which social work interventions depend are rendered immune from critical analysis. This reflects a broader tendency for social work to cling to naive realist epistemologies, which are arguably obsolete within the interpretive paradigm in which its activity is properly located. By examining the debates within interpretive social science, this paper argues for an approach to social work assessment which avoids the pitfalls of naive objectivism and the nihilism of anarchic relativism, whilst retaining creativity, imagination and hope.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 85 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.