COMPARISON BETWEEN BALANCED AND RANDOM ARRANGEMENTS OF FIELD PLOTS

Unknown author

107 citations0/0 files storedBiometrika

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Optimal Experimental Design Methods Genetics and Plant Breeding Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science

Abstract

“STUDENT”; COMPARISON BETWEEN BALANCED AND RANDOM ARRANGEMENTS OF FIELD PLOTS, Biometrika, Volume 29, Issue 3-4, 1 February 1938, Pages 363–379, https://doi.org

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 107 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1984Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments 1939THE COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES OF SYSTEMATIC AND RANDOMIZED ARRANGEMENTS IN THE DESIGN OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS 2001One hundred years of the design of experiments on and off the pages of Biometrika 2007Spatially-Balanced Complete Block designs for field experiments 2017OptimalA PrioriBalance in the Design of Controlled Experiments 2009Randomization in the Design of Experiments 1952Some Recent Work on Systematic Experimental Designs 2019Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting?

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.