Effects of an 'Expert Mode' Voice Command System on Task Performance, Glance Behavior & Driver Physiology

Abstract

Multi-function in-vehicle interfaces are an increasingly common feature in automobiles. Over the past several years, these interfaces have taken on an ever-greater number of functions and the ways in which drivers interact with information have become more complex. Parallel with these technical developments, interest in ensuring that these systems minimize demand placed upon the driver has also increased. Voice command capability has become a popular and desirable feature, as interacting with a vehicle interface through auditory/vocal interactions is often hypothesized to allow the driver to keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel. However, research has shown that production level voice command systems may still impart considerable visual demands on the driver [18]. These demands might be due in part to screen displays associated with extensive confirmatory dialogue and the driver's desire for visual confirmation that commands were accurately recognized. This study extends this work by comparing the default mode of a production voice system with an "Expert" mode which streamlines tasks by removing several confirmatory steps. We found that, although the use of the Expert mode significantly reduces overall task completion time, it has no appreciable effect on the amount of visual engagement; drivers still glance off the road for durations that are consistent with the Default mode. Implications for interface design and driver safety are discussed.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 40 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.