SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation
16 references·10 citing·34 second hop
Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation (2009)Cutting the Gordian Knot of DemarcationDemarcating Science from Non-Science (2007)Demarcating Science from Non-…P opper, K arl R (2005)P opper, K arl RFreud and the question of pseudoscience (1999)Freud and the question of pse…The disorder of things: metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science (1993)The disorder of things: metap…Handlexikon zur Wissenschaftstheorie (1989)Handlexikon zur Wissenschafts…Computational philosophy of science (1989)Computational philosophy of s…Computational Philosophy of Science (1988)Computational Philosophy of S…Abusing Science--The Case against Creationism (1982)Abusing Science--The Case aga…Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience (1978)Why Astrology is a Pseudoscie…Popper on demarcation and induction (1978)Popper on demarcation and ind…Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1976)Falsification and the Methodo…The Philosophy of Karl Popper. (1975)The Philosophy of Karl Popper.Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1970)Falsification and the Methodo…Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science (1958)Fads and Fallacies in the Nam…Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science (1958)Fads and Fallacies in the Nam…Philosophia Naturalis (1916)Philosophia NaturalisScience, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem (2023)Science, Values, and the New …Pseudoscience as a Negative Outcome of Scientific Dialogue: A Pragmatic-Naturalistic Approach to the Demarcation Problem (2021)Pseudoscience as a Negative O…Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research (2021)Distinguishing between legiti…Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem (2021)Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by…Disciplines, Doctrines, and Deviant Science (2020)Disciplines, Doctrines, and D…Science as a Vaccine (2019)Science as a VaccineAre Pseudosciences Like Seagulls? A Discriminant Metacriterion Facilitates the Solution of the Demarcation Problem (2019)Are Pseudosciences Like Seagu…Divanes y gurús: El origen y los peligros de la pseudopsicología clínica (2017)Divanes y gurús: El origen y …Science journalists’ perceptions and attitudes to pseudoscience in Spain (2014)Science journalists’ percepti…The hypothesis that saves the day: ad hoc reasoning in pseudoscience (2013)The hypothesis that saves the…The Open Society and its Enemies (1946)Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. (1964)Enacting the social (2004)The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research (2004)The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations (2007)The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change (1982)A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS? (1991)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1964)Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction (1989)Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation (1996)Evolution and Cognition (2001)Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: the impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning (2005)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Going Beyond the Consensus View: Broadening and Enriching the Scope of NOS-Oriented Curricula (2017)The Structure of Science (1961)CONJECTURES AND REFUTATIONS (1963)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators (1999)Breaking the spell: religion as a natural phenomenon (2007)Evidence and evolution: the logic behind the science (2008)Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences (1994)Semantics, cross-cultural style (2003)Epistemologies of the South (2015)Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination (1989)Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination (1992)Explaining Development and Change in Organizations (1995)Assessing evolutionary epistemology (1986)When scientific models represent (2003)Emergenz und Reduktion (2004)Critical Scientific Realism (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1970Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes4,670 cited
  • 1976Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes3,903 cited
  • 1993The disorder of things: metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science1,386 cited
  • 1975The Philosophy of Karl Popper.1,370 cited
  • 1988Computational Philosophy of Science733 cited
  • 1989Computational philosophy of science644 cited
  • 1916Philosophia Naturalis584 cited
  • 1982Abusing Science--The Case against Creationism389 cited
  • 2005P opper, K arl R337 cited
  • 1978Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience164 cited
  • 1989Handlexikon zur Wissenschaftstheorie157 cited
  • 1958Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science141 cited
  • 1978Popper on demarcation and induction128 cited
  • 2007Demarcating Science from Non-Science125 cited
  • 1999Freud and the question of pseudoscience49 cited
  • 1958Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science47 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019
Science as a Vaccine
86 cited
  • 2023Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem49 cited
  • 2014Science journalists’ perceptions and attitudes to pseudoscience in Spain45 cited
  • 2021Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem30 cited
  • 2021Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research26 cited
  • 2021Pseudoscience as a Negative Outcome of Scientific Dialogue: A Pragmatic-Naturalistic Approach to the Demarcation Problem13 cited
  • 2019Are Pseudosciences Like Seagulls? A Discriminant Metacriterion Facilitates the Solution of the Demarcation Problem10 cited
  • 2020Disciplines, Doctrines, and Deviant Science10 cited
  • 2013The hypothesis that saves the day: ad hoc reasoning in pseudoscience10 cited
  • 2017Divanes y gurús: El origen y los peligros de la pseudopsicología clínica3 cited