CHOICE AND THE RELATIVE IMMEDIACY OF REINFORCEMENT

Roger M. Dunn · Edmund J. Fantino

113 citations0/0 files storedJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Behavioral and Psychological Studies Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Abstract

The relative immediacy of reinforcement in concurrent-chain schedules was varied while the relative reduction in the overall average time to reinforcement associated with terminal-link entry was held constant. For each of four pigeons, choice did not vary with relative immediacy of reinforcement. Subsequently, choice by the same subjects was shown to be sensitive to relative reduction in average time to reinforcement.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 113 citations exist upstream.

References

1973THE CORRELATION‐BASED LAW OF EFFECT1 1967CHOICE AND DELAY OF REINFORCEMENT1 1978EFFECTS ON CHOICE OF REINFORCEMENT DELAY AND CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT 1

Cited by

1983CHOICE: SOME QUANTITATIVE RELATIONS 1993DELAY REDUCTION: CURRENT STATUS 1988Impulsiveness in pigeons living in the experimental chamber 1994DELAY REDUCTION AND OPTIMAL FORAGING: VARIABLE‐RATIO SEARCH IN A FORAGING ANALOGUE 1988Feedforward versus feedbackward: An ethological alternative to the law of effect 1985Sensitivity of pigeons to prereinforcer and postreinforcer delay 1987Operant Conditioning Simulations of Foraging and the Delay-Reduction Hypothesis 1988Self-control in context

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.