Textual determinants of a component of literary identification

Peter Dixon · Marisa Bortolussi · Mark P. Holden

56 citations0/0 files storedScientific Study of Literature

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Narrative Theory and Analysis Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity Media Influence and Health

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted on how properties of the text control one aspect of the process of identifying with the central character in a story. In particular, we were concerned with textual determinants of character transparency, that is, the extent to which the character’s actions and attitudes are clear and understandable. In Experiment 1, we hypothesized that the narrator in first-person narratives is transparent because narratorial implicatures (analogous to Grice’s (1975) notion of conversational implicatures) lead readers to attribute their own knowledge and experience to the narrator. Consistent with our predictions, the results indicated that stating the inferred information explicitly leads readers to rate the narrator’s thoughts and actions as more difficult to understand. In Experiment 2, we assessed whether this effect could be explained by differences in style between the original and modified versions of the text. The results demonstrated that there was no effect of adding text when the material was unrelated to narratorial implicatures. In Experiment 3, we hypothesized that transparency of the central character in a third-person narrative can be produced when the consistent use of free-indirect speech produces a close association between the narrator and the character; in this case, readers may attribute knowledge and experience to the character as well as the narrator. As predicted, the central character’s thoughts and actions were rated as more difficult to understand when the markers for free-indirect speech were removed. We argue that transparency may be produced through the use of what are essential conversational processes invoked in service of understanding the narrator as a conversational participant.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film 1976The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales 2013Cognitive Processes in Comprehension 2009Measuring Narrative Engagement 2018Experiencing Narrative Worlds 2004Transportation Into Narrative Worlds: The Role of Prior Knowledge and Perceived Realism 1998A Dyadic Study of Interpersonal Information Search 1990The Export of Meaning: Cross-Cultural Readings of Dallas

Cited by

2023Immersion, Identification, and the Iliad 2017Psychology of Narrative Art 2021Reading Fictional Narratives to Improve Social and Moral Cognition: The Influence of Narrative Perspective, Transportation, and Identification 2018Putting Perspective Taking in Perspective 2016The Science of Free-Indirect Discourse: An Alternate Cognitive Effect 2018Preliminary steps towards a cognitive theory of fiction and its effects

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.