Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Do Journals Publishing in the Field of Urology Endorse Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of Author Instructions

16 references·14 citing·39 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups42,389 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration3,542 cited
2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
2004Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement2,804 cited
2009A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research1,047 cited
2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
2009STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

805 cited

1994Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles480 cited

2008Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'241 cited

2006The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement235 cited

Cited by

2012Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines33 cited
2013How Psychiatry Journals Support the Unbiased Translation of Clinical Research. A Cross-Sectional Study of Editorial Policies31 cited
2014Impact of the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations With Nonrandomized Designs Reporting Guideline: Ten Years On30 cited
2018Structure formats of randomised controlled trial abstracts: a cross-sectional analysis of their current usage and association with methodology reporting25 cited
2021Comparing the reporting and conduct quality of exercise and pharmacological randomised controlled trials: a systematic review23 cited
2019Research waste‐related editorial policies of leading dental journals: Situation 201821 cited
2020Online survey about the STROBE statement highlighted diverging views about its content, purpose, and value21 cited
2017The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement20 cited
2023The endorsement of general and artificial intelligence reporting guidelines in radiological journals: a meta-research study19 cited
2022The relationship between endorsing reporting guidelines or trial registration and the impact factor or total citations in surgical journals18 cited
2019Endorsement of reporting guidelines and study registration by endocrine and internal medicine journals: meta-epidemiological study16 cited
2015Do Croatian open access journals support ethical research? Content analysis of instructions to authors16 cited
2017A Survey of the Prevalence and Impact of Reporting Guideline Endorsement in Pathology Journals13 cited
2017Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study13 cited