Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Changing expectations: Do journals drive methodological changes? Should they?

16 references·2 citing·25 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,345 cited
2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration8,588 cited
1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration3,542 cited
2008Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration2,290 cited
2005Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)2,148 cited
2008Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement1,811 cited
2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2005

REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)

1,391 cited

1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited

2003The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration1,124 cited

2009STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement805 cited

Cited by

2021Quality of reporting of clinical trials in dogs and cats: An update14 cited
2010Quality standards are needed for reporting of test accuracy studies for animal diseases13 cited