SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Academic Merit, Promotion, and Journal Peer Reviewing: The Role of Academic Institutions In Providing Proper Recognition
16 references·3 citing·46 second hop
Academic Merit, Promotion, and Journal Peer Reviewing: The Role of Academic Institutions In Providing Proper Recognition (2010)Academic Merit, Promotion, and Journal Pe…Success at Publishing in Biomedical Journals: Hints From a Journal Editor (2009)Success at Publishing in Biom…Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Editorial peer review for imp…Fifth international congress on peer review and biomedical publication (2003)Fifth international congress …The history of the peer-review process (2002)The history of the peer-revie…Publish, and be damned... (2002)Publish, and be damned...How I Review an Original Scientific Article (2002)How I Review an Original Scie…Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (2002)Fourth International Congress…Peer Review in Prague (1998)Peer Review in PragueAdvances in peer review research: an introduction (1997)Advances in peer review resea…The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (1994)The Second International Cong…The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)The Evolution of Editorial Pe…Editorial Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (1990)Editorial Peer Review in Biom…The International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (1989)The International Congress on…Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review (1986)Guarding the Guardians: A Con…Commentary: Peer Review is Alive and Well in the United States (1985)Commentary: Peer Review is Al…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer-review practices of psyc…A harm reduction approach to improving peer review by acknowledging its imperfections (2024)A harm reduction approach to …Regards croisés sur l’analphabétisme scientifique et le processus d’évaluation par les pairs (2017)Regards croisés sur l’analpha…Gender differences in providing peer review to two behavioural science journals, 2006–2015 (2017)Gender differences in providi…A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence (2009)Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN (1951)Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers (1979)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)The ups and downs of peer review (2007)Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research (2011)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)Journal Peer Review (1985)The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)Is There Gender Bias in JAMA's Peer Review Process? (1994)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2006)Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study (2019)Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias (2002)Elaboración de directrices para la publicación de investigación biomédica: proceso y fundamento científico (2005)Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial (2007)Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable (1994)Adherence to Published Standards of Reporting (1998)Congress on Biomedical Peer Review (1998)The expert witness. Neither Frye nor Daubert solved the problem: what can be done? (2001)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)The Significance of Insecure and Disorganized Attachment for Children’s Internalizing Symptoms: A Meta-Analytic Study (2012)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? (2002)How to Review a Manuscript: A "Down-to-Earth" Approach (2004)Mentoring (2004)How to review a manuscript (2010)Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Misinformation in and about science (2021)Transparency as an Instrumental Value (2006)Establishing a Systematic Six-Stage Process for Detecting Contract Cheating (2007)A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ? (2009)The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. (1990)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Let’s make peer review scientific (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
  • 2002The history of the peer-review process445 cited
  • 1990The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review346 cited
  • 2007Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies312 cited
  • 1986Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review154 cited
  • 2002How I Review an Original Scientific Article117 cited
  • 1990Editorial Peer Review in Biomedical Publication81 cited
  • 2002Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication75 cited
  • 1994The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication60 cited
  • 2002Publish, and be damned...55 cited
  • 1998Peer Review in Prague21 cited
  • 1997Advances in peer review research: an introduction18 cited
  • 1989The International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication17 cited
  • 1985Commentary: Peer Review is Alive and Well in the United States16 cited
  • 2009Success at Publishing in Biomedical Journals: Hints From a Journal Editor15 cited
  • 2003

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Fifth international congress on peer review and biomedical publication
14 cited

Cited by

  • 2024A harm reduction approach to improving peer review by acknowledging its imperfections8 cited
  • 2017Gender differences in providing peer review to two behavioural science journals, 2006–20157 cited
  • 2017Regards croisés sur l’analphabétisme scientifique et le processus d’évaluation par les pairs6 cited