THE PROMISE OF SCRIPTURAL REASONING

Daniel W. Hardy

133 citations0/0 files storedModern Theology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Biblical Studies and Interpretation Study and Philosophy of Religion Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity

Abstract

Abstract This Response reintroduces Scriptural Reasoning as portrayed in the essays, showing their various readings and reasonings and how they shed light on SR, while also identifying some lacunae in and between them. The different strengths of these views interact with each other in a highly dynamic and sustaining practice of reading and reasoning Scriptures together, where there is a high degree of mutually responsible hospitality and the possibility of achieving a complex harmony. In conclusion, three tasks for the future of SR are identified: concentrating on the seminal features of the Abrahamic traditions, targeting them and auditing SR performance.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 133 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2015Curriculum visions: The Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority (ACARA) and Dwayne Huebner discuss civics and citizenship 2011Interreligious dialogue: Moving between compartmentalization and complexity 2013Scriptural Reasoning as Inter‐Religious Dialogue 2019Reading the Bible Theologically 2013Scriptural Reasoning as a “Classic”: The Aesthetics of Interreligious Politics 2013Scriptural Reasoning: Its Anglican Origins, its Development, Practice and Significance

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.