SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The management of established postherpetic neuralgia: a comparison of the quality and content of traditional vs. systematic reviews
8 references·3 citing·35 second hop
The management of established postherpetic neuralgia: a comparison of the quality and content of traditional vs. systematic reviews (1998)The management of established postherpeti…Systematic Reviews: Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health care (1994)Systematic Reviews: Reporting…Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care (1994)An investigation of the adequ…A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group (1994)A proposal for structured rep…The Science of Reviewing Researcha (1993)The Science of Reviewing Rese…A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)A Comparison of Results of Me…Needed: Review Articles with More Scientific Rigor (1987)Needed: Review Articles with …Empleo de las revisiones sistemáticas en ensayos clínicos y revisiones narrativas en dermatología: ¿se usa la mejor evidencia disponible? (2014)Empleo de las revisiones sist…The Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic Reviewing (2009)The Value of “Traditional” Re…The Cochrane Skin Group: Promoting the Best Evidence (2005)The Cochrane Skin Group: Prom…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)Guidelines for reading literature reviews. (1988)Coping in sport: A systematic review (2006)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Psychological resilience in sport performers: a review of stressors and protective factors (2014)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)How Consumers and Policymakers Can Use Systematic Reviews for Decision Making (1997)Is this clinical trial fully registered? A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2005)Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1) (2005)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. (1998)LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES (2003)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)The standard of reporting of health-related quality of life in clinical cancer trials (2000)Assessment of Methodologic Quality of Randomized Trials of Interventional Techniques: Development of an Interventional Pain Management Specific Instrument (2014)Evaluating the role of digital intervention design in treatment outcomes and adherence to eTherapy programs for eating disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,678 cited
  • 1992A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts1,517 cited
  • 1993The Science of Reviewing Researcha473 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health care171 cited
  • 1994An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care122 cited
  • 1994A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group90 cited
  • 1987Needed: Review Articles with More Scientific Rigor28 cited

Cited by

  • 2009The Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic Reviewing109 cited
  • 2005The Cochrane Skin Group: Promoting the Best Evidence11 cited
  • 2014Empleo de las revisiones sistemáticas en ensayos clínicos y revisiones narrativas en dermatología: ¿se usa la mejor evidencia disponible?10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work