On Being Neither Post- Nor Anti-Kantian: A Reply to Breazeale and Larmore ConcerningThe Fate of Autonomy

Karl Ameriks

55 citations0/0 files storedInquiry

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophical Ethics and Theory Political Philosophy and Ethics Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations

Abstract

(2003). On Being Neither Post- Nor Anti-Kantian: A Reply to Breazeale and Larmore Concerning The Fate of Autonomy. Inquiry: Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 272-292.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 55 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2005The Persistence of Subjectivity 2013The Cambridge history of philosophy in the nineteenth century (1790-1870)2012The Cambridge History of Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century (1790–1870)2012Attempts to Rethink Logic

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.