SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
More Peering Into Editorial Peer Review
5 references·5 citing·37 second hop
More Peering Into Editorial Peer Review (1993)More Peering Into Editorial Peer ReviewThe Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)The Philosophical Basis of Pe…Editorial Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (1990)Editorial Peer Review in Biom…Peer Review in Medical Journals (1987)Peer Review in Medical Journa…Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review (1986)Guarding the Guardians: A Con…Malice's wonderland: Research funding and peer review (1983)Malice's wonderland: Research…Experienced journal reviewers' perceptions of and engagement with the task of reviewing: an Australian perspective (2013)Experienced journal reviewers…The Ups and Downs of Peer Review: Making Funding Choices for Science (2000)The Ups and Downs of Peer Rev…What We Owe The Author: rethinking editorial peer review (1998)What We Owe The Author: rethi…Identifying peer-reviewed journals in clinical medicine. (1997)Identifying peer-reviewed jou…Science, Law, and the Search for Truth in the Courtroom: Lessons from Daubert v. Merrell Dow (1994)Science, Law, and the Search …Journal Peer Review (1985)The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)Is There Gender Bias in JAMA's Peer Review Process? (1994)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2006)Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study (2019)Science: The Endless Frontier (1945)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Chronicle of Higher Education (1996)Discouragement of innovation by overcompetitive research funding (2001)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Interpreting Qualitative Data Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction (1997)Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) (2003)Moral Thinking (1981)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1984)Statistical Evaluation of Medical Journal Manuscripts (1966)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Editorial peer review: Let us put it on trial (1992)Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals (2013)Peer review (2014)Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom (1992)Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies (1993)Should Unpublished Data Be Included in Meta-analyses? (1993)How to Build Yourself a Body in a Safe Space (2006)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Policies, practices, and attitudes of north american medical journal editors (1995)The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review-part 1 (1996)Science and Its Malfunctions (2008)How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems (1997)A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research (2008)Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study (2015)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. (1990)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Let’s make peer review scientific (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation436 cited
  • 1986Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review154 cited
  • 1990Editorial Peer Review in Biomedical Publication81 cited
  • 1983Malice's wonderland: Research funding and peer review45 cited
  • 1987Peer Review in Medical Journals25 cited

Cited by

  • 1994Science, Law, and the Search for Truth in the Courtroom: Lessons from Daubert v. Merrell Dow16 cited
  • 1997Identifying peer-reviewed journals in clinical medicine.9 cited
  • 2000The Ups and Downs of Peer Review: Making Funding Choices for Science8 cited
  • 2013Experienced journal reviewers' perceptions of and engagement with the task of reviewing: an Australian perspective8 cited
  • 1998What We Owe The Author: rethinking editorial peer review8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work