Challenging Awards of the Court of Arbitration for Sport

Antonio Rigozzi

45 citations0/0 files storedJournal of International Dispute Settlement

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

International Arbitration and Investment Law Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction Dispute Resolution and Class Actions

Abstract

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), sitting in Lausanne, Switzerland, is the pinnacle of the worldwide dispute settlement system for sport matters. CAS enjoys significant autonomy from states, despite the great importance of its decisions for the lives of athletes. Setting aside proceedings against CAS arbitral awards may only be filed with the Swiss Supreme Court due to the seat of CAS tribunals being in Lausanne. The number of such setting aside proceedings has greatly increased, to the point that almost half of the Supreme Court’s case load relating to international arbitration now concerns CAS awards. The present article critically reviews the most important questions that arise in the context of such setting aside proceedings, with an eye to the practical needs of the actors involved in such procedures.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 45 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2016The Independence and Impartiality of ICSID Arbitrators Current Case Law, Alternative Approaches, and Improvement Suggestions 2013Arbitration clauses in sport governing bodies’ statutes: consent or constraint? Analysis from the perspective of Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights 2018Sport exceptionalism and the Court of Arbitration for Sport

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.