SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Pharmaceutical Science Faculty Publication Records at Research-Intensive Pharmacy Colleges and Schools
12 references·8 citing·44 second hop
Pharmaceutical Science Faculty Publication Records at Research-Intensive Pharmacy Colleges and Schools (2012)Pharmaceutical Science Faculty Publicatio…Publication Metrics and Record of Pharmacy Practice Chairs (2009)Publication Metrics and Recor…New Indices in Scholarship Assessment (2009)New Indices in Scholarship As…Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals (2009)Comparisons of Citations in W…Author name disambiguation (2009)Author name disambiguationWhich h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison…Separating the articles of authors with the same name (2007)Separating the articles of au…Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields (2007)Scaling the h-index for diffe…A rational indicator of scientific creativity (2007)A rational indicator of scien…Citation Analysis: A Comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (2006)Citation Analysis: A Comparis…Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Prevalence of Articles With H…Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)Problems of citation analysis…The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)The frequency distribution of…A Bibliometric Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Journal Publications of Pharmacy Practice Department Chairs (2021)A Bibliometric Analysis of Pe…Three Commonly Utilized Scholarly Databases and a Social Network Site Provide Different, But Related, Metrics of Pharmacy Faculty Publication (2020)Three Commonly Utilized Schol…A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 NIH-Funded colleges of pharmacy using two databases (2019)A bibliometric analysis of th…Scientific output of the emerging Cuban biopharmaceutical industry: a scientometric approach (2016)Scientific output of the emer…Performance Benchmarks for Scholarly Metrics Associated with Fisheries and Wildlife Faculty (2016)Performance Benchmarks for Sc…Factors affecting scholarly performance by wildlife and fisheries faculty (2016)Factors affecting scholarly p…Publication Rates for Pharmaceutical Sciences Faculty Members at Nonresearch-Intensive US Schools of Pharmacy (2015)Publication Rates for Pharmac…Quantifying Published Scholarly Works of Experiential Education Directors (2013)Quantifying Published Scholar…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases (2019)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)Duplicate and fake publications in the scientific literature: how many SCIgen papers in computer science? (2012)Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents? (2016)Education for advancing the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals: A systematic approach (2019)A Theory for Record Linkage (1969)CiteSeer (1998)A comparison of string distance metrics for name-matching tasks (2003)Author name disambiguation: What difference does it make in author‐based citation analysis? (2012)A Keyword Co-Occurrence Analysis of Research on Service Learning: Conceptual Foci and Emerging Research Trends (2023)SciSciNet: A large-scale open data lake for the science of science research (2023)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university (2009)Living with the H-Index? Metric Assemblages in the Contemporary Academy (2012)A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective (2018)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)Is There a Relationship between National Institutes of Health Funding and Research Impact on Academic Urology? (2013)Part II: Should the h-Index Be Modified? An Analysis of the m-Quotient, Contemporary h-Index, Authorship Value, and Impact Factor (2013)The creative person in science. (2013)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Knowledge Epidemics and Population Dynamics Models for Describing Idea Diffusion (2011)Combination of research questions and methods: A new measurement of scientific novelty (2022)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution (1998)Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales (1998)hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices (2009)A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators (2014)A theoretical model of the relationship between the h-index and other simple citation indicators (2017)O papel da informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional (1998)Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? (2010)From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy (2016)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)What is research collaboration? (1997)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1926The frequency distribution of scientific productivity2,266 cited
  • 2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals819 cited
  • 1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review803 cited
  • 2007Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar728 cited
  • 1998Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals553 cited
  • 2006Citation Analysis: A Comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science260 cited
  • 2009Author name disambiguation252 cited
  • 2007Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields232 cited
  • 2009New Indices in Scholarship Assessment89 cited
  • 2007A rational indicator of scientific creativity56 cited
  • 2007Separating the articles of authors with the same name45 cited
  • 2009Publication Metrics and Record of Pharmacy Practice Chairs37 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Publication Rates for Pharmaceutical Sciences Faculty Members at Nonresearch-Intensive US Schools of Pharmacy27 cited
  • 2016Scientific output of the emerging Cuban biopharmaceutical industry: a scientometric approach20 cited
  • 2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 NIH-Funded colleges of pharmacy using two databases
18 cited
  • 2016Factors affecting scholarly performance by wildlife and fisheries faculty16 cited
  • 2013Quantifying Published Scholarly Works of Experiential Education Directors9 cited
  • 2020Three Commonly Utilized Scholarly Databases and a Social Network Site Provide Different, But Related, Metrics of Pharmacy Faculty Publication9 cited
  • 2021A Bibliometric Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Journal Publications of Pharmacy Practice Department Chairs9 cited
  • 2016Performance Benchmarks for Scholarly Metrics Associated with Fisheries and Wildlife Faculty7 cited