Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Clinical trials in orthodontics II: assessment of the quality of reporting of clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998

16 references·16 citing·30 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
1994Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals512 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited

1996The Importance of Quality of Primary Studies in Producing Unbiased Systematic Reviews328 cited

2001Randomized, controlled trials in surgery201 cited

Cited by

2017Randomized clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors, reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955–201343 cited
2005Elaboración de directrices para la publicación de investigación biomédica: proceso y fundamento científico43 cited
2016A quality assessment of randomized controlled trial reports in endodontics41 cited
2015Reporting quality of randomised controlled trials published in prosthodontic and implantology journals39 cited
2010How well do reports of clinical trials in the orthodontic literature comply with the CONSORT statement?36 cited
2012What’s in a title? An assessment of whether randomized controlled trial in a title means that it is one36 cited
2015Risk of bias and magnitude of effect in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological review35 cited
2011Quality of randomised controlled trials in dentistry35 cited
2011Reporting of Research Quality Characteristics of Studies Published in 6 Major Clinical Dental Specialty Journals33 cited
2019Adherence of Randomized Controlled Trials to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 Guidelines: A Survey of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2011-2016 in 3 Periodontology Journals23 cited
2014An assessment of the quality of reporting randomised controlled trials published in paediatric dentistry journals23 cited
2015Demographic characteristics of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials in orthodontic journals with impact factor23 cited
2012Mislabeling Controlled Clinical Trials (CCTs) as “Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs)” in Dental Specialty Journals18 cited
2009Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products18 cited
2015Reporting of clinical trials in the orthodontic literature from 2008 to 2012: observational study of published reports in four major journals17 cited
2017Authorship characteristics of orthodontic randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses in non-orthodontic journals with impact factor16 cited