The North American Menopause Society

Peter F. Schnatz · Alison Romegialli · Jessica Abrantes · Kimberly A. Marakovits · David M. O’Sullivan

30 citations0/0 files storedMenopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Writing and Publishing Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) provides a forum through which researchers can present scientific abstracts. After presenting an abstract, the goal is to publish the research as a full-length article. The objective for this study was to determine the publication rate of abstracts presented at NAMS meetings. DESIGN: The PubMed database was searched for full-length, peer-reviewed publications, corresponding to the abstracts presented at the 1999 to 2003 NAMS meetings. When a full-length article was found, the title, authors, date of publication, and the journal were collected. RESULTS: Of the 661 abstracts presented at the five consecutive annual meetings, 253 (38.3%) have been published in peer-reviewed journals. The average time to publication was 2.0 +/- 1.5 years. The average time to publication for oral presentations was 1.7 +/- 1.3 years, and that for poster presentations was 2.0 +/- 1.5 years (P = 0.241). The publication rate of oral presentations was significantly greater than that of poster presentations (57.7% vs 36.5%; P < 0.003). Manuscripts were published in a total of 97 journals, with four (Menopause, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, Climacteric, and Maturitas) accounting for 38.3% of the publications. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of abstracts published by NAMS is within the range and within a similar time frame compared with other scientific meetings. Oral presentations are more likely to be rapidly published and may therefore be of higher interest and clinical relevance along with sound methodology and results. Menopause contained the most manuscripts, demonstrating a possible preference of submission to the Society's journal.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 30 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors 2003BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS AT ANNUAL ORTHOPAEDIC MEETINGS 1998Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting 1997Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals 1999The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals.1999The Publication Rates of Presentations at Major Spine Specialty Society Meetings (NASS, SRS, ISSLS)1993Publication of abstracts presented at anaesthesia meetings 2004Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association

Cited by

2013Publication of Research Presented at STFM and NAPCRG Conferences 2015Conversion of Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine abstract presentations to manuscript publications 2015Analysis of full-text publication and publishing predictors of abstracts presented at an Italian public health meeting (2005–2007)2015From Poster Presentation to Publication: National Congress of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.