First evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the evaluation of national science systems

Thed N. van Leeuwen · Henk F. Moed · Robert Tijssen · Martijn S. Visser · Anthony F. J. van Raan

49 citations0/0 files storedResearch Evaluation

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

Th N van Leeuwen, H F Moed, R J W Tijssen, M S Visser, A F J van Raan; First evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the eval

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 49 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2016A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals 2015National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers 2008Citation Characteristics and Intellectual Acceptance of Scholarly Monographs 2001Some Misuses of Journal Impact Factor in Research Evaluation 2014Chinese-language articles are not biased in citations: Evidences from Chinese-English bilingual journals in Scopus and Web of Science 2012Impact factor trends for general medical journals: non-English-language journals are lagging behind 2011Female researchers in Russia: have they become more visible?2005Comparison and evaluation of domestic and international outputs in Information Science & Technology research of China

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.