SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Case for Open Preprints in Biology
6 references·16 citing·43 second hop
The Case for Open Preprints in Biology (2013)The Case for Open Preprints in BiologyBest Practices for Scientific Computing (2014)Best Practices for Scientific…Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science (2013)Git can facilitate greater re…Academia's obsession with quantity (2012)Academia's obsession with qua…ArXiv at 20 (2011)ArXiv at 20The tragedy of the reviewer commons* (2008)The tragedy of the reviewer c…The Ingelfinger Rule (1981)The Ingelfinger RulePreprintMatch: A tool for preprint to publication detection shows global inequities in scientific publication (2023)PreprintMatch: A tool for pre…A Guide to Posting and Managing Preprints (2021)A Guide to Posting and Managi…Preprint manuscripts and servers in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (2020)Preprint manuscripts and serv…Envisioning the scientific paper of the future (2020)Envisioning the scientific pa…COVID-19 Preprints and Their Publishing Rate: An Improved Method (2020)COVID-19 Preprints and Their …Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science (2019)Quantifying the Growth of Pre…Preprint policies among 14 academic publishers (2019)Preprint policies among 14 ac…Open access principles and practices benefit conservation (2019)Open access principles and pr…Preprinting Microbiology (2017)Preprinting MicrobiologyMedical Preprints—A Debate Worth Having (2017)Medical Preprints—A Debate Wo…Goodbye genome paper, hello genome report: the increasing popularity of ‘genome announcements’ and their impact on science: Table 1. (2016)Goodbye genome paper, hello g…Will technology trample peer review in ecology? Ongoing issues and potential solutions (2015)Will technology trample peer …Time for a prepublication culture in clinical research? (2015)Time for a prepublication cul…The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline? (2015)The evolution of peer review …The four pillars of scholarly publishing: The future and a foundation (2014)The four pillars of scholarly…Open Scholarship and Peer Review: a Time for Experimentation (2013)Open Scholarship and Peer Rev…Reflection, turning experience into learning (1985)What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity (2004)Predicting Publication Success for Biologists (2013)Promoting reflection in learning: A model (2013)Rising complexity and falling explanatory power in ecology (2014)Solving the Productivity and Impact Puzzle: Do Men Outperform Women, or are Metrics Biased? (2016)An Incentive Solution to the Peer Review Problem (2007)Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases (2010)Emperor’s New Clothes (2014)Attitudes of referees in a multidisciplinary journal: An empirical analysis (2016)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)The case for open computer programs (2012)The promise of preschool in Africa: A randomized impact evaluation of early childhood development in rural Mozambique (2013)A Quick Introduction to Version Control with Git and GitHub (2016)Ten Simple Rules for Taking Advantage of Git and GitHub (2016)The Ingelfinger Rule Revisited (1991)Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators (2013)Accelerating scientific publication in biology (2015)Towards an open science publishing platform (2016)Consistency of covid-19 trial preprints with published reports and impact for decision making: retrospective review (2022)Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)Multiple publication of reports of drug trials (1989)Some problems in conceptualizing the issue of “science and the media” (1990)The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review-part 1 (1996)Preprints for the life sciences (2016)On the use of blockchain-based mechanisms to tackle academic misconduct (2019)Promoting an open research culture (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The science of fake news (2018)Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research (2021)Teaching Science Communication with Comics for Postgraduate Students (2021)Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing (2021)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Epistemic injustice in academic global health (2021)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Comparison of effect estimates between preprints and peer-reviewed journal articles of COVID-19 trials (2024)Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science (2024)Good enough practices in scientific computing. (2017)Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools (2017)A Large-Scale Study About Quality and Reproducibility of Jupyter Notebooks (2019)arXiv E‐prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships (2014)Beyond Bibliometrics (2014)The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Best Practices for Scientific Computing715 cited
  • 2013Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science230 cited
  • 2011ArXiv at 20125 cited
  • 2012Academia's obsession with quantity121 cited
  • 1981The Ingelfinger Rule115 cited
  • 2008The tragedy of the reviewer commons*82 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Envisioning the scientific paper of the future54 cited
  • 2017Medical Preprints—A Debate Worth Having52 cited
  • 2023PreprintMatch: A tool for preprint to publication detection shows global inequities in scientific publication49 cited
  • 2015Time for a prepublication culture in clinical research?44 cited
  • 2020Preprint manuscripts and servers in the era of coronavirus disease 201943 cited
  • 2021A Guide to Posting and Managing Preprints42 cited
  • 2019Preprint policies among 14 academic publishers39 cited
  • 2014The four pillars of scholarly publishing: The future and a foundation38 cited
  • 2015The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?34 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2017
Preprinting Microbiology
28 cited
  • 2013Open Scholarship and Peer Review: a Time for Experimentation22 cited
  • 2016Goodbye genome paper, hello genome report: the increasing popularity of ‘genome announcements’ and their impact on science: Table 1.18 cited
  • 2020COVID-19 Preprints and Their Publishing Rate: An Improved Method18 cited
  • 2019Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science16 cited
  • 2019Open access principles and practices benefit conservation16 cited
  • 2015Will technology trample peer review in ecology? Ongoing issues and potential solutions16 cited