Implications of the IFRS goodwill accounting treatment

Graeme Wines · Ron Dagwell · Carolyn A. Windsor

94 citations0/0 files storedManagerial Auditing Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Accounting and Financial Management

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to critically examine the change in accounting treatment for goodwill pursuant to international financial reporting standards (IFRSs) by reference to the Australian reporting regime. Design/methodology/approach The paper discusses and compares the former Australian and the new IFRS treatments for goodwill. This comparison focuses on the advantages and potential complexities of the new method, with the aim of identifying the issues and challenges that preparers, independent auditors and those involved in corporate governance face in complying with the new requirements. Findings The paper highlights that the identification and valuation of cash‐generating units and goodwill require numerous assumptions to be made in estimating fair value, value in use and recoverable amount. Considerable ambiguity and subjectivity are inherent in the IFRS requirements. Research limitations/implications Findings suggest that future research should examine how financial report preparers and corporate governance mechanisms are dealing with the complex change required by the new goodwill accounting treatment and how the many critical issues involved in auditing the resulting figures are being addressed. Practical implications The research has practical implications for financial report preparers in identifying the issues that must be addressed in complying with the international goodwill accounting treatment. In turn, the paper highlights conceptual issues of relevance to auditors in their role of providing assurance on the resulting accounting numbers. It also has implications for others involved in corporate governance, such as audit committee members, in emphasising the areas in which they should be providing oversight of the accounting judgments. These issues are of relevance in any reporting regime based on IFRSs. Originality/value While much has been written about the mechanics of the new goodwill accounting requirements, there has been a lack of critical research highlighting the many problems and ambiguities that will arise in the application of those rules.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 94 citations exist upstream.

References

1982Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution.1981Comparative International Accounting 1964The philosophy of auditing.2003Principles-Based Accounting Standards 2006Fair-value accounting: A cautionary tale from Enron 1995The effect of client management bargaining power, moral reasoning development, and belief in a just world on auditor independence 2006Australian Accounting Standards 2003Accounting for Goodwill: Are We Better Off?

Cited by

2016Relative reliability and the recognisable firm: Calculating goodwill impairment value 2015Effect of audit quality and accounting and finance backgrounds of audit committee members on firms’ compliance with IFRS for goodwill impairment testing 2011Goodwill impairment testing under IFRS: a false impossible shore?2014Goodwill under IFRS: Relevance and disclosures in an unfavorable environment 2023Value Relevance Research in Accounting and Reporting Domains: A Bibliometric Analysis 2010

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.