Fate of Abstracts Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Korean Urological Association

Jae Hoon Chung · Riccardo Autorino B · Dong Hyuk Kang · Joo Yong Lee · Hong Sang Moon · Hong Yong Choi +1 more

5 citations0/0 files storedKorean journal of urology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Writing and Publishing scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

PURPOSE: The acceptance rate for journal publication of the abstracts presented at the annual Korean Urological Association (KUA) meeting, the time to publication, and the effect of abstract characteristics on the publication pattern were analyzed and compared with data for abstracts from other major urological meetings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,005 abstracts listed in the abstract books of the 2006 (58th) and 2007 (59th) annual KUA meetings were analyzed, and their subsequent publication as listed in PubMed or KoreaMed between August 2006 and August 2011 was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 41.59% of abstracts were published as full-length reports. Abstracts on sexual dysfunction, neurourology, prostate cancer, basic research, and benign prostatic hyperplasia showed the highest publication rates (54%, 52.27%, 48%, 47.56%, and 45%, respectively). It took 19.01±12.83 months on average for abstracts to be published in a journal, whereas it took 25.24±14.64 months and 17.51±11.89 months for publication in foreign and Korean journals, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of studies presented as abstracts at the KUA meeting are subsequently published as full-length articles. The KJU is the most targeted journal. The mean time to publication is 1.5 years, and publication seems to be influenced by the study subject.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?1998Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting 1998Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting 2006Abstracts Presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: Determinants of Subsequent Peer Reviewed Publication 2004Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association 2006Are Abstracts Presented at the EAU Meeting Followed by Publication in Peer-Reviewed Journals?

Cited by

2018Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.