Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Usefulness of Peer Review for Selecting Manuscripts for Publication: A Utility Analysis Taking as an Example a High-Impact Journal

16 references·8 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2008What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior1,598 cited
2008Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact810 cited
1984Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in OrganizationsCosting Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations, by CascioWayne F. Boston, Mass.: Kent Publishing Company, 1982, 244 pp., $12.95 paper.682 cited
1983Assessing basic research528 cited
1939The relationship of validity coefficients to the practical effectiveness of tests in selection: discussion and tables.491 cited
1984Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations446 cited
2004Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems438 cited
1996Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises383 cited
2007Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature373 cited
2007Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results359 cited
2004Measuring Science279 cited
2002Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review230 cited
1989Using citation counts as a measure of quality in science measuring what's measurable rather than what's valid

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

164 cited

1986Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications158 cited

2008Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes112 cited

1994Guardians of Science: Fairness and Reliability of Peer Review109 cited

Cited by

2012The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis54 cited
2019Heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in research evaluation51 cited
2013The wisdom of citing scientists50 cited
2013Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings?47 cited
2012The A nna K arenina principle: A way of thinking about success in science47 cited
2017Persistent factors facilitating excellence in research environments18 cited
2011The quality-quantity-quasity and energy-exergy-entropy exegesis of expected value calculation of citation performance12 cited
2019La revisión por pares (“peer review”) en las revistas científicas: un proceso que requiere intervención11 cited