Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence (1980)

Abstract

I want to say a little about the way "Compulsory Heterosexuality" was originally conceived and the context in which we are now living. It was written in part to challenge the erasure of lesbian existence from so much of scholarly feminist literature, an erasure which I felt (and feel) to be not just anti-lesbian, but anti-feminist in its consequences, and to distort the experience of heterosexual women as well. It was not written to widen divisions but to encourage heterosexual feminists to examine heterosexuality as a political institution which disempowers women—and to change it. I also hoped that other lesbians would feel the depth and breadth of woman identification and woman bonding that has run like a continuous though stifled theme through the heterosexual experience, and that this would become increasingly a politically activating impulse, not simply a validation of personal lives. I wanted the essay to suggest new kinds of criticism, to incite new questions in classrooms and academic journals, and to sketch, at least, some bridge over the gap between lesbian and feminist. I wanted, at the very least, for feminists to find it less possible to read, write, or teach from a perspective of unexamined heterocentricity.

Cite this

Adrienne Cecile Rich (2003). Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence (1980). Journal of women's history. https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2003.0079

@article{cecile2003compulsory,
  title  = {Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence (1980)},
  author = {Rich, Adrienne Cecile},
  year   = {2003},
  journal = {Journal of women's history},
  doi    = {10.1353/jowh.2003.0079}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2,398 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by