The Readability of Published, Accepted, and Rejected Papers Appearing in College & Research Libraries

Cheryl Metoyer-Duran

31 citations0/0 files storedCollege & Research Libraries

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Writing and Publishing scientometrics and bibliometrics research Text Readability and Simplification

Abstract

This study examined the readability of papers that College & Research Libraries accepted, rejected, and published for 1990 and 1991.In addition to showing a statistically significant difference for the text of papers, but not for the abstracts, this investigation reports topics for further investigation and presents a procedure for others to follow in replicating the study.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2007The Quest for Citations: Drivers of Article Impact 2010The virtues of opaque prose: How lay beliefs about fluency influence perceptions of quality 2020Business-to-business marketing research: Assessing readability and discussing relevance to practitioners 2023Style, content, and the success of ideas 2016When science meets cluttered writing: adjectives and adverbs in academia revisited 2011The readability of academic papers in the Journal of Property Investment & Finance 2013Editorial: Evidence-based Guidelines for Avoiding Poor Readability in Manuscripts Submitted to Journals for Review for Publication 2014The Case for a Complexity Continuum

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.