Articlegold2012

Promoting interdisciplinary education − the Vienna Doctoral Programme on Water Resource Systems

Günter Blöschl · Gemma Carr · Christian G. Bucher · Andreas H. Farnleitner · Helmut Rechberger · Wolfgang Wagner +1 more

31 citations0/0 files storedHydrology and earth system sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions Sustainability in Higher Education

Abstract

Abstract. The Vienna Doctoral Programme on Water Resource Systems (DK-WRS) is a programme that aims to educate students in interdisciplinary water science through cutting edge research at an international level. It is funded by the Austrian Science Fund and designed to run over a period of 12 yr during which 80 doctoral students are anticipated to graduate. This paper reports on our experiences of setting up and implementing the Programme. We identify three challenges: integrating the disciplines, maintaining depth in an interdisciplinary programme, and teaching subjects remote to each student's core expertise. To address these challenges we adopt a number of approaches. We use three levels of instruments to foster integration across the disciplines: joint groups (e.g. a joint study programme), joint science questions (e.g. developed in annual symposia), and joint study sites. To maintain depth we apply a system of quality control including regular feedback sessions, theses by journal publications and international study exchange. For simultaneously teaching students from civil and environmental engineering, biology, geology, chemistry, mathematics we use visually explicit teaching, learning by doing, extra mentoring and by cross relating associated subjects. Our initial assessment of the Programme shows some very positive outcomes. Joint science questions formed between students from various disciplines indicate integration is being achieved. The number of successful publications in top journals suggests that depth is maintained. Positive feedback from the students on the variety and clarity of the courses indicates the teaching strategy is working well. Our experiences have shown that implementing and running an interdisciplinary doctoral programme has its challenges and is demanding in terms of time and human resources but seeing interactions progress and watching people grow and develop their way of thinking in an interdisciplinary environment is a valuable reward.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

References

2001Social Capital and the Environment 2010Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature 2006Trust in management and knowledge sharing: The mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation 2002Toward a Synthesis of the Newtonian and Darwinian Worldviews 1999The Challenges of Conducting Interdisciplinary Research in Traditional Doctoral Programs 1976Do You See What I See? The Epistemology of Interdisciplinary Inquiry 2009Practising interdisciplinarity in the interplay between disciplines: experiences of established researchers 1998Dances with wolves? Interdisciplinary research on the global environment

Cited by

2020People and water: understanding integrated systems needs integrated approaches 2017Emerging outcomes from a cross-disciplinary doctoral programme on water resource systems

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.