Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed

16 references·8 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests1,860 cited
2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests1,345 cited
2002Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines960 cited
2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests851 cited
2004Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy800 cited
1995Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good711 cited
2006Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies612 cited
2006Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways459 cited
2002Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Evaluation of diagnostic procedures358 cited
2003Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study312 cited
2006When Is Measuring Sensitivity and Specificity Sufficient To Evaluate a Diagnostic Test, and When Do We Need Randomized Trials?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

268 cited

2000Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficient239 cited

2006Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies162 cited

Cited by

2009Proposals for a Phased Evaluation of Medical Tests117 cited
2010Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological movements in lower extremity joints is generally low: a systematic review95 cited
2010A systematic review of PET and PET/CT in oncology: A way to personalize cancer treatment in a cost-effective manner?95 cited
2012Chapter 2: Medical Tests Guidance (2) Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks81 cited
2014Diagnostic tests often fail to lead to changes in patient outcomes67 cited
2017Common evidence gaps in point-of-care diagnostic test evaluation: a review of horizon scan reports66 cited
2012Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks31 cited
2018Determining qualitative effect size ratings using a likelihood ratio scatter matrix in diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews27 cited