SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Research Studies
16 references·2 citing·38 second hop
Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Research Studies (2007)Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical…Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement (2006)Reporting Randomized, Control…Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Improving the Reporting Quali…Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Better Reporting of Harms in …Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality (2002)Quality of Reporting of Rando…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Recommendations for reporting…Recommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses (1996)Recommendations for Reporting…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ (1996)Guidelines for authors and pe…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical Journals (1988)Guidelines for Statistical Re…Staying Put, But Not Standing Still (2011)Staying Put, But Not Standing…STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement (2009)STrengthening the REporting o…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (1987)Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (1996)Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases (2006)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations (2022)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008)Fundamental Movement Skills in Children and Adolescents (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2004Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement2,804 cited
  • 1996Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ1,821 cited
  • 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials1,426 cited
  • 1996Recommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses1,146 cited
  • 1996Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine1,037 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,026 cited
  • 2006Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement606 cited
  • 2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited
  • 1988Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical Journals385 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2011Staying Put, But Not Standing Still29 cited
    • 2009STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement10 cited