SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Optimal information size in trial sequential analysis of time-to-event outcomes reveals potentially inconclusive results because of the risk of random error
15 references·2 citing·29 second hop
Optimal information size in trial sequential analysis of time-to-event outcomes reveals potentially inconclusive results because of the risk of random error (2013)Optimal information size in trial sequent…Trial Sequential Boundaries for Cumulative Meta-Analyses (2013)Trial Sequential Boundaries f…Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves (2012)Enhanced secondary analysis o…The Number of Patients and Events Required to Limit the Risk of Overestimation of Intervention Effects in Meta-Analysis—A Simulation Study (2011)The Number of Patients and Ev…GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating th…Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses (2009)Estimating required informati…Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)Trial sequential analysis rev…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses? (2008)Can trial sequential monitori…Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses (2008)Apparently conclusive meta-an…Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Trial sequential analysis may…Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis (2007)Practical methods for incorpo…Aggregate data meta‐analysis with time‐to‐event outcomes (2002)Aggregate data meta‐analysis …Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (1998)Overcoming the limitations of…Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Extracting summary statistics…Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care (1995)Cumulative meta-analysis of c…Estimating the standardized mean difference with minimum risk: Maximizing accuracy and minimizing cost with sequential estimation. (2016)Estimating the standardized m…Trial sequential analysis has the potential to improve the reliability of conclusions in meta-analysis (2013)Trial sequential analysis has…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution (2013)Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2017)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Survival Analysis for Economic Evaluations Alongside Clinical Trials—Extrapolation with Patient-Level Data (2013)Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect (2019)IPDfromKM: reconstruct individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves (2021)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Evolution of Heterogeneity (I2) Estimates and Their 95% Confidence Intervals in Large Meta-Analyses (2012)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Thresholds for the cost–effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches (2014)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2007Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis6,205 cited
  • 1998Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints4,809 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision2,681 cited
  • 2012Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves2,553 cited
  • 2007Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis1,879 cited
  • 2008Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses1,117 cited
  • 2009Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses940 cited
  • 2008Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses917 cited
  • 2008Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?834 cited
  • 2002Aggregate data meta‐analysis with time‐to‐event outcomes551 cited
  • 1998Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials428 cited
  • 1995Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

358 cited
  • 2011The Number of Patients and Events Required to Limit the Risk of Overestimation of Intervention Effects in Meta-Analysis—A Simulation Study320 cited
  • 2013Trial Sequential Boundaries for Cumulative Meta-Analyses76 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016Estimating the standardized mean difference with minimum risk: Maximizing accuracy and minimizing cost with sequential estimation.14 cited
    • 2013Trial sequential analysis has the potential to improve the reliability of conclusions in meta-analysis12 cited