SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Clinical Evidence Articles in Equine Veterinary Journal : progress since inception
10 references·1 citing·39 second hop
Clinical Evidence Articles in Equine Veterinary Journal : progress since inception (2006)Clinical Evidence Articles in Equine Vete…The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement (2005)The quality of randomized tri…Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother? (2005)Assessing allocation concealm…Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Improving the Reporting Quali…Guidelines for Reporting Non-Randomised Studies (2004)Guidelines for Reporting Non-…Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Better Reporting of Harms in …Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1998)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement (1996)Better reporting of randomise…Using Systematic Reviews to Critically Appraise the Scientific Information for the Bovine Veterinarian (2012)Using Systematic Reviews to C…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials (2008)Research Review: Recommendations for reporting on treatment trials for child and adolescent anxiety disorders – an international consensus statement (2020)CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals (2009)Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review (2011)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Risk of bias in research in oral and maxillofacial surgery (2013)Clinical trials in allied medical fields: A cross-sectional analysis of World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (2016)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)How to Critically Appraise the Clinical Literature (2014)Rigor, Transparency, and Reporting Social Science Research (2015)Evaluating the quality of studies reporting on clinical applications of stromal vascular fraction: A systematic review and proposed reporting guidelines (CLINIC-STRA-SVF) (2023)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire Depression Project randomised controlled trial (2000)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2004Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement2,804 cited
  • 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 1996Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement610 cited
  • 2005The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement216 cited
  • 1998Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement177 cited
  • 2004Guidelines for Reporting Non-Randomised Studies79 cited
  • 2005Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomised controlled trials: why bother?29 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Using Systematic Reviews to Critically Appraise the Scientific Information for the Bovine Veterinarian8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work