Beyond the ‘Salvation’ Paradigm: Responsibility To Protect (Others) vs the Power of Protecting Oneself

Abstract

Abstract The emergence of the idea of a ‘responsibility to protect’ has dominated debates about what should be done to stop atrocities. I argue that, despite notable progress, R2P remains embedded in a vision of ‘international’ rescue as primarily coming from outside, and as such ends up neglecting the very real and often much more decisive role that ‘people’ — individuals, civil society, resistance movements — have had in protecting themselves. I argue for a rehabilitation of the role of resistance to atrocities, a better understanding of how the international intervention paradigm may affect it, and a new understanding of the proper role of the international community — one of helping people to help themselves in the face of massive violence.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 60 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.