SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
On a measure of consistency in comparison measurements
3 references·5 citing·26 second hop
On a measure of consistency in comparison measurements (2002)On a measure of consistency in comparison…"GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT" (GUM) AND "MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF NATIONAL MEASUREMENT STANDARDS AND OF CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY NATIONAL METROLOGY INSTITUTES" (MRA): SOME PROBLEMS OF DATA PROCESSING AND MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION (2001)"GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF U…Possible advantages of a robust evaluation of comparisons (2000)Possible advantages of a robu…Determination of eh , Using Macroscopic Quantum Phase Coherence in Superconductors: Implications for Quantum Electrodynamics and the Fundamental Physical Constants (1969)Determination of eh , Using M…Metrological traceability method for atomic absolute gravimeters (2021)Metrological traceability met…Analysis of key comparison data and laboratory biases (2008)Analysis of key comparison da…Combining inconsistent data from interlaboratory comparisons (2007)Combining inconsistent data f…Recent recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Length (CCL) regarding strategies for evaluating key comparison data (2006)Recent recommendations of the…Consistency tests for key comparison data (2004)Consistency tests for key com…Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1995)The evaluation of key comparison data (2002)GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT (2006)Linking of a RMO key comparison to a related CIPM key comparison using the degrees of equivalence of the linking laboratories (2010)Data comparisons and uncertainty: a roadmap for gaining in competence and improving the reliability of results (2019)Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography (1986)A practical procedure for assigning a reference value and uncertainty in the frame of an interlaboratory comparison (2007)CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2010 (2012)A new method for estimating consensus values in interlaboratory comparisons (2017)An approach to combining results from multiple methods motivated by the ISO GUM (2000)Combined result and associated uncertainty from interlaboratory evaluations based on the ISO Guide (2002)Extending chi-squared statistics for key comparisons in metrology (2005)Statistical analysis for multiple artefact problem in key comparisons with linear trends (2005)Bayesian evaluation of comparison data (2006)The BNM Watt Balance Project (2005)Watt balance experiments for the determination of the Planck constant and the redefinition of the kilogram (2012)Five examples of assessment and expression of measurement uncertainty (2012)How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research. (1987)A Brief History of Research Synthesis (2002)CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2002 (2005)Possible new definitions of the kilogram (2005)Laplace random effects models for interlaboratory studies (2010)Establishing comparability and compatibility in the purity assessment of high purity zinc as demonstrated by the CCQM-P149 intercomparison (2018)Statistical analysis of CIPM key comparisons based on the ISOGuide (2004)Analysis of key comparisons: estimating laboratories' biases by a fixed effects model using Bayesian model averaging (2010)Towards a new GUM—an update (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1969Determination of eh , Using Macroscopic Quantum Phase Coherence in Superconductors: Implications for Quantum Electrodynamics and the Fundamental Physical Constants614 cited
  • 2000Possible advantages of a robust evaluation of comparisons102 cited
  • 2001"GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT" (GUM) AND "MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF NATIONAL MEASUREMENT STANDARDS AND OF CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY NATIONAL METROLOGY INSTITUTES" (MRA): SOME PROBLEMS OF DATA PROCESSING AND MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION92 cited

Cited by

  • 2008Analysis of key comparison data and laboratory biases31 cited
  • 2007Combining inconsistent data from interlaboratory comparisons31 cited
  • 2004Consistency tests for key comparison data29 cited
  • 2006Recent recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Length (CCL) regarding strategies for evaluating key comparison data16 cited
  • 2021Metrological traceability method for atomic absolute gravimeters14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work