SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Counting publications and citations: Is more always better? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleCounting publications and citations: Is more always better?

Ludo Waltman2013

OA

Articlegreen2013

Counting publications and citations: Is more always better?

Ludo Waltman · Nees Jan van Eck · Paul F. Wouters

81 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Informetrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 81 citations exist upstream.

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output 1976A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes 2008What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior 2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation 1975Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations 1983Assessing basic research 2011The inconsistency of the h‐index 2007Citation analysis

Cited by

2023Contribution of Business Research to Sustainable Development Goals: Bibliometrics and Science Mapping Analysis 2018On the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and Mendeley readership counts: A large-scale analysis of Web of Science publications 2017Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications 2018On the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and Mendeley readership counts: A large-scale analysis of Web of Science publications 2016A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2019Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometricschapter · 6 shared references 2013How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citationsarticle · 6 shared references 2013How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top‐cited papersarticle · 6 shared references 2019Field Normalization of Scientometric Indicatorschapter · 5 shared references 2019Heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in research evaluationarticle · 5 shared references 2021Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]article · 5 shared references

Details

Year2013

Typearticle

Published2013-04-29

VenueJournal of Informetrics

ISSN-L1751-1577

Languageen

Citations81

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.joi.2013.04.001

openalex_workW2052071685

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2019Predicting the research performance of early career scientists

2017Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications

2019Наукометрія та управління науковою діяльністю: вкотре про світове та українське