SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Impact vitality: an indicator based on citing publications in search of excellent scientists
16 references·2 citing·39 second hop
Impact vitality: an indicator based on citing publications in search of excellent scientists (2009)Impact vitality: an indicator based on ci…The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index (2007)The R- and AR-indices: Comple…h-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications (2006)h-index sequence and h-index …Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Fatal attraction: Conceptual …Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies (2005)Counting methods are decisive…Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Citation Analysis in Research…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university (2004)Peer reviews and bibliometric…The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence (2003)The Holy Grail of science pol…Scoreboards of research excellence (2003)Scoreboards of research excel…Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon (2003)Better late than never? On th…Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? (2002)Benchmarking international sc…The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome (2001)The Decision-Making Constrain…Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria (1998)Comparative analysis of a set…The skewness of science (1992)The skewness of sciencePeerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. (1990)Peerless Science: Peer Review…Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Chance and Consensus in Peer …Scientometric portrait of biochemist Santiago Grisolia: publication productivity, collaboration patterns, and citation analysis (2014)Scientometric portrait of bio…A preliminary investigation on diffusion through a layered system (2012)A preliminary investigation o…Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science (1967)Assessing basic research (1983)New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? (2007)A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact (2010)Are female researchers less cited? A large‐scale study of Norwegian scientists (2011)The sociology of science (1973)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 (2012)The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits (2012)A Hirsch-type index for journals (2006)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations (2009)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review System (1991)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices (2012)Governing Science (2016)Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises (1996)Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level (2008)A bibliometric analysis of born global firms (2018)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison (2010)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems (1997)Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature (2007)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation1,390 cited
  • 2005Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods764 cited
  • 1992The skewness of science713 cited
  • 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
  • 2007The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index561 cited
  • 2002Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?251 cited
  • 2003The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence207 cited
  • 2001The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome205 cited
  • 1998Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria191 cited
  • 2003Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon182 cited
  • 2004Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university177 cited
  • 1990Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy.175 cited
  • 2006h-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications109 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2005Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies101 cited
  • 2003Scoreboards of research excellence95 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2014Scientometric portrait of biochemist Santiago Grisolia: publication productivity, collaboration patterns, and citation analysis9 cited
    • 2012A preliminary investigation on diffusion through a layered system8 cited