Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A Cost Function Approach to the Measurement of Elasticities of Factor Demand and Elasticities of Substitution

1 references·16 citing·56 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1964RESEARCH EXPENDITURES, EDUCATION AND THE AGGREGATE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION FUNCTION411 cited

Cited by

2007Energy consumption and economic growth in Asian economies: A more comprehensive analysis using panel data785 cited
2018The impact of green innovation on energy intensity: An empirical analysis for 14 industrial sectors in OECD countries564 cited
2008Forecasting the path of China's CO2 emissions using province-level information440 cited
1997Induced Innovation, Evolutionary Theory and Path Dependence: Sources of Technical Change393 cited
2018Immigration Restrictions as Active Labor Market Policy: Evidence from the Mexican Bracero Exclusion226 cited
1990Returns to Scale and Input Substitution for Large U. S. Banks225 cited
2001The Structure of Municipal Water Supply Costs: Application to a Panel of French Local Communities220 cited
1982A Translog Cost Function Analysis of U.S. Agriculture, 1939–77213 cited
1979The Effect of Demographic Factors on Age-Earnings Profiles206 cited
1979The Effect of Demographic Factors on Age-Earnings Profiles178 cited
1983Multiple Input, Multiple Output Production Choices and Technology in the U.S. Wheat Region165 cited
1986Chapter 31 Econometric methods for modeling producer behavior155 cited
2015Evaluating the impact of rising fertilizer prices on crop yields

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

134 cited

1980The Structure of Production and the Derived Demand for Inputs in Canadian Agriculture130 cited

2010Production Economics and Farm Management: a Century of Contributions118 cited

2018Housing productivity and the social cost of land-use restrictions106 cited