SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Average effect estimates remain similar as evidence evolves from single trials to high-quality bodies of evidence: a meta-epidemiologic study
10 references·1 citing·47 second hop
Average effect estimates remain similar as evidence evolves from single trials to high-quality bodies of evidence: a meta-epidemiologic study (2015)Average effect estimates remain similar a…The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses (2013)The GRADE approach is reprodu…Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study (2013)Influence of trial sample siz…Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update (2013)Grading the Strength of a Bod…Empirical Evaluation of Very Large Treatment Effects of Medical Interventions (2012)Empirical Evaluation of Very …GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…Updating Systematic Reviews (2007)Updating Systematic ReviewsEarly extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials (2005)Early extreme contradictory e…The truly remarkable universality of half a standard deviation: confirmation through another look (2004)The truly remarkable universa…Effect sizes in cumulative meta-analyses of mental health randomized trials evolved over time (2004)Effect sizes in cumulative me…A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility (1989)A Concordance Correlation Coe…Trial-level characteristics associate with treatment effect estimates: a systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies (2022)Trial-level characteristics a…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study (2002)Cultural competence and evidence-based practice in mental health: Epistemic communities and the politics of pluralism (2012)Efficacy of Pharmacotherapy and Psychotherapy for Adult Psychiatric Disorders (2014)The Robustness of the Corporate Social and Financial Performance Relation: A Second‐Order Meta‐Analysis (2018)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for depression in children and adolescents: A systematic review and network meta-analysis (2015)Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies (2016)Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews (2016)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)Measurement of health status (1989)SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide (2003)Approaches and Recommendations for Estimating Minimally Important Differences for Health-Related Quality of Life Measures (2005)The health and psychosocial functioning of caregivers of children with neurodevelopmental disorders (2009)Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (2019)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review (2018)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Association Between Analytic Strategy and Estimates of Treatment Outcomes in Meta-analyses (2014)Characteristics of Effective Collaborative Care for Treatment of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression of 74 Randomised Controlled Trials (2014)Agreement of treatment effects for mortality from routinely collected data and subsequent randomized trials: meta-epidemiological survey (2016)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Meta-analytic evidence for effects of mindfulness training on dimensions of self-reported dispositional mindfulness. (2016)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better? (2016)A systematic review of clinical supervision evaluation studies in nursing (2018)Mortality Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in the Veterans Health Administration: An Evidence Review and Map (2018)Modernizing the systematic review process to inform comparative effectiveness: tools and methods (2013)A comparative analysis of semi-supervised learning: The case of article selection for medical systematic reviews (2016)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluation (1991)Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine (1998)Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1989A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility8,782 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
  • 2013Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study543 cited
  • 2004The truly remarkable universality of half a standard deviation: confirmation through another look490 cited
  • 2013The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses369 cited
  • 2005Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials326 cited
  • 2012Empirical Evaluation of Very Large Treatment Effects of Medical Interventions257 cited
  • 2004Effect sizes in cumulative meta-analyses of mental health randomized trials evolved over time177 cited
  • 2013Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update115 cited
  • 2007Updating Systematic Reviews51 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Trial-level characteristics associate with treatment effect estimates: a systematic review of meta-epidemiological studies11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work