Questioning the Institutional Boundaries of U.S. Communication Research: An Epistemological Inquiry

Ian H. Angus · John W. Lannamann

6 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Communication

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Communication Studies and Media Media Studies and Communication Rhetoric and Communication Studies

Abstract

Interpreting three levels of assumptions—the ideal case, the object-domain, and the method of inquiry—for each of the three subdisciplines of communication—rhetoric, interpersonal and mass—provides a foundation for assessing an appropriate and comprehensive definition of the domain of communication study.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1964Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man 1927Being and Time 1980Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living 2016Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences 2017Methodology of Social Sciences 2017A Rhetoric of Motives 1998Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.