SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Spectrum bias: a quantitative and graphical analysis of the variability of medical diagnostic test performance
1 references·7 citing·30 second hop
Spectrum bias: a quantitative and graphical analysis of the variability of medical diagnostic test performance (2003)Spectrum bias: a quantitative and graphic…A Meta-analytic Method for Summarizing Diagnostic Test Performances (1993)A Meta-analytic Method for Su…Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (2021)Institute for Clinical and Ec…A new method for synthesizing test accuracy data outperformed the bivariate method (2020)A new method for synthesizing…Cochran's Q test was useful to assess heterogeneity in likelihood ratios in studies of diagnostic accuracy (2014)Cochran's Q test was useful t…Clinimetrics corner: the many faces of selection bias (2010)Clinimetrics corner: the many…Decision-Analytic Modeling to Evaluate Benefits and Harms of Medical Tests: Uses and Limitations (2009)Decision-Analytic Modeling to…Spectrum bias--why clinicians need to be cautious when applying diagnostic test studies (2008)Spectrum bias--why clinicians…A methodological framework to distinguish spectrum effects from spectrum biases and to assess diagnostic and screening test accuracy for patient populations: Application to the Papanicolaou cervical cancer smear test (2008)A methodological framework to…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)Limitations in Medical Research: Recognition, Influence, and Warning (2024)Patient Perspectives on Blended Internet-Based and Face-to-Face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder: Qualitative Study (2024)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Sleep duration and risk of diabetes: Observational and Mendelian randomization studies (2018)Gender-affirming hormone treatment and cognitive function in transgender young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Chronotype and cognitive function: Observational study and bidirectional Mendelian randomization (2022)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Chapter 10: Deciding Whether to Complement a Systematic Review of Medical Tests with Decision Modeling (2012)Using meta‐analysis to inform the design of subsequent studies of diagnostic test accuracy (2012)Assessing value of innovative molecular diagnostic tests in the concept of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (2015)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (2004)A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies (2013)Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Detecting depressive and anxiety disorders in distressed patients in primary care; comparative diagnostic accuracy of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (2009)Risk of bias from inclusion of patients who already have diagnosis of or are undergoing treatment for depression in diagnostic accuracy studies of screening tools for depression: systematic review (2011)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Limits in the search date for rapid reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies (2022)Overconfident results with the bivariate random effects model for meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies (2022)Should studies with no events in both arms be excluded in evidence synthesis? (2022)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Patient Versus Physician Valuation of Durable Survival Gains: Implications for Value Framework Assessments (2017)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1993A Meta-analytic Method for Summarizing Diagnostic Test Performances155 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Cochran's Q test was useful to assess heterogeneity in likelihood ratios in studies of diagnostic accuracy417 cited
  • 2008Spectrum bias--why clinicians need to be cautious when applying diagnostic test studies153 cited
  • 2009Decision-Analytic Modeling to Evaluate Benefits and Harms of Medical Tests: Uses and Limitations88 cited
  • 2021Institute for Clinical and Economic Review60 cited
  • 2010Clinimetrics corner: the many faces of selection bias58 cited
  • 2020A new method for synthesizing test accuracy data outperformed the bivariate method36 cited
  • 2008A methodological framework to distinguish spectrum effects from spectrum biases and to assess diagnostic and screening test accuracy for patient populations: Application to the Papanicolaou cervical cancer smear test25 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work