No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
One-hundred and fifty-three students took one of four tests differing in face validity. They subsequently received computer-generated feedback of a traditional bogus interpretation (Barnum) or a jargon-filled negatively-toned interpretation (Prosecuting Attorney). Each S rated the feedback for accuracy and likability. Face validity was independent of both accuracy and likability scores regardless of type of feedback. Barnum feedback was judged both more accurate and likable than was Prosecuting Attorney feedback. Females had higher accuracy scores than did males. Accuracy and likability scores were significantly correlated. These results confirm Delprato's (1975) findings relative to face validity and Barnum feedback. That this finding extends to Prosecuting Attorney feedback refutes the notion that Delprato's results were due to the high base rate of the Barnum statements.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.