The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literatureJoshua Carp2012-07-10articleNeuroImage457 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesPsychology Research and BibliometricsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 457 citations exist upstream.References1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsCited by2018Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results2014Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention2020Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals2016Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template2019Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event‐related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability2019Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science2020Social Cognition in the Age of Human–Robot Interaction2018Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI