SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Drawbacks of peer review
0 references·10 citing·49 second hop
Drawbacks of peer review (1993)Drawbacks of peer reviewAcademic Journals, Incentives, and the Quality of Peer Review: A Model (2023)Academic Journals, Incentives…Understanding the peer review endeavor in scientific publishing (2022)Understanding the peer review…How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector (2015)How peer-review constrains co…Peer Review and Bibliometric: Potentials and Problems (2011)Peer Review and Bibliometric:…The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science (2010)The predictive validity of pe…Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing. (2010)Peer review and journal impac…Are three heads better than two? How the number of reviewers and editor behavior affect the rejection rate (2009)Are three heads better than t…Use of bibliometric information to assist research policy making. A comparison of publication and citation profiles of Full and Associate Professors at a School of Chemistry in Uruguay (2006)Use of bibliometric informati…Achieving “Reviewer Readiness” (2003)Achieving “Reviewer Readiness”The Ups and Downs of Peer Review: Making Funding Choices for Science (2000)The Ups and Downs of Peer Rev…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Ranking Romanian academic departments in three fields of study using theg-index (2015)Ejes de discusión en la evaluación de la ciencia: revisión por pares, bibliometría y pertinencia (2016)Use of scholarly communication and citation-based metrics as a basis for university ranking in developing country perspective (2020)Science: The Endless Frontier (1945)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Chronicle of Higher Education (1996)Discouragement of innovation by overcompetitive research funding (2001)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates (1988)Publishing as Prostitution? – Choosing Between One's Own Ideas and Academic Success (2003)Rejection Rates for Journals Publishing in the Atmospheric Sciences (2010)Quantifying the Volunteer Effort of Scientific Peer Reviewing (2011)Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism (2014)Work and motivation (1964)13 "DOES CULTURAL CAPITAL STRUCTURE AMERICAN CONSUMPTION?" (1998) (1998)Winning the Service Game (2010)Status quo bias in decision making (1988)Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model (1991)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Group-based judgmental forecasting: An integration of extant knowledge and the development of priorities for a new research agenda (2010)Peering Into Peer Review (2010)Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Do Rankings Reflect Research Quality? (2008)Bibliometric analysis for development of research strategies in agricultural technology: the case of Taiwan (2012)Detecting latent referential articles based on their vitality performance in the latest 2 years (2017)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (1979)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness (2008)Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (2017)The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals (2018)Cognition in Organisations: What it Is and how it Works (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)The More Publication, the Higher Impact Factor: Citation Analysis of Top Nine Gastroenterology and Hepatology Journals (2012)Trends of the main bibliometric indicators of Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia (2010–2019) (2021)Effects of open access publishing on article metrics in Neuropsychopharmacology (2024)A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1964)Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations (2002)Does writing style affect gender differences in the research performance of articles?: An empirical study of BERT-based textual sentiment analysis (2023)The effectiveness of peer review in identifying issues leading to retractions (2023)Can peer review accolade awards motivate reviewers? A large-scale quasi-natural experiment (2024)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2010The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science58 cited
  • 2009Are three heads better than two? How the number of reviewers and editor behavior affect the rejection rate40 cited
  • 2022Understanding the peer review endeavor in scientific publishing32 cited
  • 2015How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector29 cited
  • 2006Use of bibliometric information to assist research policy making. A comparison of publication and citation profiles of Full and Associate Professors at a School of Chemistry in Uruguay23 cited
  • 2010Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing.22 cited
  • 2011Peer Review and Bibliometric: Potentials and Problems16 cited
  • 2003Achieving “Reviewer Readiness”11 cited
  • 2023Academic Journals, Incentives, and the Quality of Peer Review: A Model9 cited
  • 2000The Ups and Downs of Peer Review: Making Funding Choices for Science8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work