SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Identificación de ensayos clínicos en revistas dermatológicas publicadas en español
14 references·2 citing·47 second hop
Identificación de ensayos clínicos en revistas dermatológicas publicadas en español (2015)Identificación de ensayos clínicos en rev…Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies (2010)Inclusion of methodological f…Evolución de la investigación clínica publicada por los dermatólogos españoles y comparación con otros grupos en 2008 (2010)Evolución de la investigación…Clinical Research Publication by Spanish Dermatologists Over Time and in Comparison With Other Research Groups in 2008 (2010)Clinical Research Publication…Searching the LILACS Database Could Improve Systematic Reviews in Dermatology (2009)Searching the LILACS Database…A highly sensitive search strategy for clinical trials in Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) was developed (2008)A highly sensitive search str…[Clinical trials published in Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación: characteristics and quality of design]. (2007)[Clinical trials published in…It's in your hands: the value of handsearching in conducting systematic reviews of public health interventions (2005)It's in your hands: the value…Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality (2005)Effectiveness of different da…Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Development of a highly sensi…A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials (2002)A comparison of handsearching…How Can Hand Searching the Dermatological Literature Benefit People With Skin Problems? (2001)How Can Hand Searching the De…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…Quality assessment of controlled clinical trials published in Orthopaedics and Traumatology journals in Spanish: An observational study through handsearching and evidence mapping (2018)Quality assessment of control…Identification and description of controlled clinical trials published in Spanish Ophthalmology Journals (2018)Identification and descriptio…North and South: bridging the information gap (2000)Optimal literature search for systematic reviews in surgery (2017)Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies (2018)The safety of health care for ethnic minority patients: a systematic review (2020)How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature? (2000)What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is “insufficient evidence”? (2004)The Cochrane Skin Group: Promoting the Best Evidence (2005)How prominent are patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of dermatological treatments? (2008)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Randomized controlled trials in pediatric critical care: a scoping review (2013)Reporting methodological search filter performance comparisons: a literature review (2014)Significant discrepancies were found in pooled estimates of searching with Chinese indexes versus searching with English indexes (2015)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews (2013)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis (2015)The CONSORT Statement (1996)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Grey Literature Searching for Health Sciences Systematic Reviews: A Prospective Study of Time Spent and Resources Utilized (2014)HOW TO DO A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW IN NURSING: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE (2016)A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review (2017)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)The Cochrane Collaboration (1995)Registering Clinical Trials (2003)Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials (2007)Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Identifying Randomised Trials (2001)The methodologic quality of clinical trials on regional anesthesia for cataract surgery11This article is based on research conducted by the Johns Hopkins University under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, formerly the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (contract no.: 290-97-0006). The authors of this article are responsible for its contents, including any clinical or treatment recommendations. No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2001)Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials4,099 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 2002Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed833 cited
  • 2010Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies117 cited
  • 2002A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials117 cited
  • 2005It's in your hands: the value of handsearching in conducting systematic reviews of public health interventions98 cited
  • 2005Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality83 cited
  • 2008A highly sensitive search strategy for clinical trials in Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) was developed37 cited
  • 2001How Can Hand Searching the Dermatological Literature Benefit People With Skin Problems?25 cited
  • 2007[Clinical trials published in Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación: characteristics and quality of design].15 cited
  • 2010Evolución de la investigación clínica publicada por los dermatólogos españoles y comparación con otros grupos en 200813 cited
  • 2010

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Clinical Research Publication by Spanish Dermatologists Over Time and in Comparison With Other Research Groups in 2008
8 cited
  • 2009Searching the LILACS Database Could Improve Systematic Reviews in Dermatology8 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Identification and description of controlled clinical trials published in Spanish Ophthalmology Journals6 cited
    • 2018Quality assessment of controlled clinical trials published in Orthopaedics and Traumatology journals in Spanish: An observational study through handsearching and evidence mapping6 cited