Comparison of three short forms of the category test

Abstract

The Category Test is a sensitive indicator of general cortical integrity, but requires an extremely long time for impaired subjects to complete. As a result, several authors have proposed abbreviated forms of the test. In this investigation, Study 1 compared three previously published short forms with the long form. Subjects were 100 consecutive adult referrals for neuropsychological assessment. Long-form protocols were rescored to yield the equivalent scores for the short forms. The 120-item short form appeared to be an excellent alternative to the long form. It correlated .981 with the standard 208-item Category Test, and had a comparatively small standard error of estimate. Study 2 compared the process of problem-solving by 52 additional subjects on this short form with the process on the equivalent items of the rescored protocols used to obtain the correlations. The processes appeared very similar.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.